Hi Shiv,
-- Original Message --
From "Shiv Shankar Dayal"
mailto:shivshankar.da...@gmail.com>>
To "mailing list for ConTeXt users"
mailto:ntg-context@ntg.nl>>
Date 1/24/2024 9:44:09 AM
Subject [NTG-context] Re: Using plain TeX commands in ConTeXt
**
Yes.
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 10:08 PM luigi scarso
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 at 16:55, Shiv Shankar Dayal <
> shivshankar.da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for correcting me, Wolfgang. I meant only TeX commands not plan
>> TeX macros.
>&g
On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 at 16:55, Shiv Shankar Dayal <
shivshankar.da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for correcting me, Wolfgang. I meant only TeX commands not plan TeX
> macros.
>
>
TeX primitives ?
--
luigi
_
Shiv Shankar Dayal schrieb am 24.01.2024 um 16:52:
Thanks for correcting me, Wolfgang. I meant only TeX commands not plan
TeX macros.
As I already wrote you can use \parindent etc. in your document but
unless you
know what you're doing you should keep it to a minimum to avoid conflicts
Thanks for correcting me, Wolfgang. I meant only TeX commands not plan TeX
macros.
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 9:20 PM Wolfgang Schuster <
wolfgang.schuster.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Shiv Shankar Dayal schrieb am 24.01.2024 um 16:37:
> > For example: \kern, \parindent and so
Shiv Shankar Dayal schrieb am 24.01.2024 um 16:37:
For example: \kern, \parindent and so on. Rephrasing the question, can
LuaMetaTeX/ConTeXt compile
plain TeX files. If yes, how can I do that?
You mix up two different things here.
1. Plain TeX is a collection of TeX macros like ConTeXt
For example: \kern, \parindent and so on. Rephrasing the question, can
LuaMetaTeX/ConTeXt compile
plain TeX files. If yes, how can I do that?
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 9:02 PM Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 1/24/2024 2:55 PM, Shiv Shankar Dayal wrote:
> > Dear List,
> >
> > Can we u
On 1/24/2024 2:55 PM, Shiv Shankar Dayal wrote:
Dear List,
Can we use plain TeX commands which are available in LuaMetaTeX in an
arbitrary manner or are there any restrictions?
what do you mean with arbitrary plain tex commands
Dear List,
Can we use plain TeX commands which are available in LuaMetaTeX in an
arbitrary manner or are there any restrictions?
--
Respect,
Shiv Shankar Dayal
___
If your question is of interest to others as well
Am Mittwoch, 13. Dezember 2023, 21:57:35 CET schrieb Bruce Horrocks:
>
> > On 13 Dec 2023, at 17:13, Gerion Entrup wrote:
> >
> > Is there a simple way to define a new command/environment and handle
> > the keyword arguments in Lua? For example defining a frontend command
> > like this:
>
> I
> On 13 Dec 2023, at 17:13, Gerion Entrup wrote:
>
> Is there a simple way to define a new command/environment and handle
> the keyword arguments in Lua? For example defining a frontend command
> like this:
I don't have the answer to your other questions but I do have an example for
this one.
of)
autogenerated description:
https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Command/setupitemgroup
I found the data for this (at least this is my guess) here:
tex/texmf-context/tex/context/interface/mkiv/i-itemgroup.xml
Are these xml files created by hand or somehow generated? Now, when I
use `\setupitemgroup
to put it all together, this now works for me:
\definefontfamily [mainface] [rm] [TeX Gyre Pagella]
\definefontfamily [mainface] [ss] [TeX Gyre Heros]
\starttypescript [math] [default] [size]
\definebodyfont [8.5pt] [mm] [default]
\stoptypescript
\definetypeface [mainface] [mm] [math] [p
[mainface] [mm] [math] [pagella]
\definetypeface generates the same error message if the font size is
changed:
\definefontfamily [mainface] [rm] [TeX Gyre Pagella]
\definefontfamily [mainface] [ss] [TeX Gyre Heros]
\definetypeface [mainface] [mm] [math] [pagella]
%% 8pt works
\setupbodyfont
m] [math] [pagella]
\definetypeface generates the same error message if the font size is
changed:
\definefontfamily [mainface] [rm] [TeX Gyre Pagella]
\definefontfamily [mainface] [ss] [TeX Gyre Heros]
\definetypeface [mainface] [mm] [math] [pagella]
%% 8pt works
\setupbodyfont [mainface, 8.5pt]
On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 20:51:42 +0100
Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
> > %% comment/remove this line and it works
> > \definefontfamily [mainface] [mm] [TeX Gyre Pagella Math]
>
> Use the \definetypeface command to load the math font.
That example was taken stra
Marco Patzer schrieb am 30.11.2023 um 20:43:
Hi!
I have a strange issue when TeX Gyre Pagella Math is used together
with bold text. MWE:
\definefontfamily [mainface] [rm] [TeX Gyre Pagella]
\definefontfamily [mainface] [ss] [TeX Gyre Heros]
%% comment/remove this line and it works
Hi!
I have a strange issue when TeX Gyre Pagella Math is used together
with bold text. MWE:
\definefontfamily [mainface] [rm] [TeX Gyre Pagella]
\definefontfamily [mainface] [ss] [TeX Gyre Heros]
%% comment/remove this line and it works
\definefontfamily [mainface] [mm] [TeX Gyre Pagella Math
Hi,
a friend just asked for a LaTeX book in Czech to give a PhD student for
their birthday.
According to https://www.cstug.cz/informace/literatura/, there are only
outdated TeX books in Czech. Is that true?
Looking at the CSTUG page, I wondered why our ConTeXt meeting isn’t
listed in https
typographical advise about using primes (foot/inch marks):
https://practicaltypography.com/foot-and-inch-marks.html
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist :
On 7/7/2023 1:09 PM, Carlos wrote:
\showmakeup displays it astonishingly correctly indeed
probably a side effect of the fact that injected stuff resynchronizes
the character progression in the pdf file (every char start with
explicit coordinates) while without showing it depends on the width
2:32PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
> > > > > On 7/5/2023 5:53 PM, Carlos wrote:
> > > > > > On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 04:43:56PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
> > > > > > > On 7/5/2023 3:18 PM, Carlos wrote:
> > > > > > > > \showmakeup
> > > > > On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 04:43:56PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
> > > > > > On 7/5/2023 3:18 PM, Carlos wrote:
> > > > > > > \showmakeup on \TeX\ shows a
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 07:37:56PM +0200, Hans Hagen via ntg-context wrote:
> On 7/5/2023 7:05 PM, Carlos wrote:
>
> > And I don't want to stir up anything here either, but if the convention of
> > using non-official vs official fonts is the new de facto under lmtx,
> > I guess my opening
te:
> > > > > On 7/5/2023 3:18 PM, Carlos wrote:
> > > > > > \showmakeup on \TeX\ shows a
> > > > > >
> > > > > > tSP:3.282
> > > > > > THK:-1.721
> > > > > > H__E
> > > >
On 7/5/2023 7:05 PM, Carlos wrote:
And I don't want to stir up anything here either, but if the convention of
using non-official vs official fonts is the new de facto under lmtx,
I guess my opening question is invalid by all acounts
Well, the policy wrt font is quite simple:
(1) one can
On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 06:15:41PM +0200, Alan Braslau via ntg-context wrote:
> On 05/07/23 05/07/23, 17:53, Carlos wrote:
> > (sorry for duplicate messages. sending out to mailing list works
> > sporadically Sometimes works, other times doesn't).
>
> As reported, the contextgarden server was
On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 06:12:32PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 7/5/2023 5:53 PM, Carlos wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 04:43:56PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
> > > On 7/5/2023 3:18 PM, Carlos wrote:
> > > > \showmakeup on \TeX\ shows a
> > > >
> &g
On 7/5/2023 6:38 PM, Carlos wrote:
On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 06:12:32PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 7/5/2023 5:53 PM, Carlos wrote:
On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 04:43:56PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 7/5/2023 3:18 PM, Carlos wrote:
\showmakeup on \TeX\ shows a
tSP:3.282
THK:-1.721
H__E
X
HK:-1.291
On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 06:12:32PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 7/5/2023 5:53 PM, Carlos wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 04:43:56PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
> > > On 7/5/2023 3:18 PM, Carlos wrote:
> > > > \showmakeup on \TeX\ shows a
> > > >
> &g
On 05/07/23 05/07/23, 17:53, Carlos wrote:
(sorry for duplicate messages. sending out to mailing list works
sporadically Sometimes works, other times doesn't).
As reported, the contextgarden server was down following a disk
controller failure and had taken some time to be reconfigured with
On 7/5/2023 5:53 PM, Carlos wrote:
On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 04:43:56PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 7/5/2023 3:18 PM, Carlos wrote:
\showmakeup on \TeX\ shows a
tSP:3.282
THK:-1.721
H__E
X
HK:-1.291
SP:3.282
no MWE includes so clueless
\starttypescript[mylucidaserif]
\definefontsynonym
On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 11:53:47AM -0400, Carlos wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 04:43:56PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
> > On 7/5/2023 3:18 PM, Carlos wrote:
> > > \showmakeup on \TeX\ shows a
> > >
> > > tSP:3.282
> > > THK:-1.721
> > > H__E
On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 04:43:56PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 7/5/2023 3:18 PM, Carlos wrote:
> > \showmakeup on \TeX\ shows a
> >
> > tSP:3.282
> > THK:-1.721
> > H__E
> > X
> > HK:-1.291
> > SP:3.282
>
> no MWE includes so cluel
On 7/5/2023 3:18 PM, Carlos wrote:
\showmakeup on \TeX\ shows a
tSP:3.282
THK:-1.721
H__E
X
HK:-1.291
SP:3.282
no MWE includes so clueless
> I assume that SP stands for space. Correct me if I'm wrong
After reading some of the manuals that mention \showmakeup with and
without [spa
On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 09:32:51AM -0400, Carlos wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 09:18:35AM -0400, Carlos wrote:
> > \showmakeup on \TeX\ shows a
> >
> > tSP:3.282
> > THK:-1.721
> > H__E
> > X
> > HK:-1.291
> > SP:3.282
> >
>
On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 09:18:35AM -0400, Carlos wrote:
> \showmakeup on \TeX\ shows a
>
> tSP:3.282
> THK:-1.721
> H__E
> X
> HK:-1.291
> SP:3.282
>
> I assume that SP stands for space. Correct me if I'm wrong
>
> After reading some of the manuals that me
\showmakeup on \TeX\ shows a
tSP:3.282
THK:-1.721
H__E
X
HK:-1.291
SP:3.282
I assume that SP stands for space. Correct me if I'm wrong
After reading some of the manuals that mention \showmakeup with and
without [spaces] and so forth, I couldn't find any more info related
to this.
If anyone
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 05:57:30PM +0200, Hans Hagen via ntg-context wrote:
> On 4/11/2023 3:13 PM, Carlos via ntg-context wrote:
>
> > But where is actually luametatex under the standalone sources
> just in the bin path
thanks Hans.
Didn't have the time to look at et . Looking at a small
On 4/11/2023 3:13 PM, Carlos via ntg-context wrote:
But where is actually luametatex under the standalone sources
just in the bin path
Hans
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 12:20:32PM +0200, Hans Hagen via ntg-context wrote:
> On 4/11/2023 12:00 PM, Carlos via ntg-context wrote:
>
> > and belongs to TeX Live?
>
> well, i suppose there is a non-empty copy in texlive but an empty one can go
> indeed
>
> > > &g
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 12:20:32PM +0200, Hans Hagen via ntg-context wrote:
> On 4/11/2023 12:00 PM, Carlos via ntg-context wrote:
>
> > and belongs to TeX Live?
>
> well, i suppose there is a non-empty copy in texlive but an empty one can go
> indeed
>
> > > &g
On 4/11/2023 12:00 PM, Carlos via ntg-context wrote:
and belongs to TeX Live?
well, i suppose there is a non-empty copy in texlive but an empty one
can go indeed
Here we go! Back to point A where we were at before
as alan pointed out: just install with the lmtx installer in a path
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 11:23:45AM +0200, Hans Hagen via ntg-context wrote:
> On 4/11/2023 11:11 AM, Carlos via ntg-context wrote:
>
> > Hello Alan, my PATH is set to:
> >
> > PATH=/home/ce/context-install/bin:/home/ce/context-install/tex/texmf-linux-64/bin:/opt/texli
On 4/11/2023 11:11 AM, Carlos via ntg-context wrote:
Hello Alan, my PATH is set to:
PATH=/home/ce/context-install/bin:/home/ce/context-install/tex/texmf-linux-64/bin:/opt/texlive/2023/bin/x86_64-linux:$PATH;
export PATH
what is that first path doing there
Do we actually need to list all
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 10:01:55PM -0600, Alan Braslau via ntg-context wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Apr 2023 20:51:58 -0400 (EDT)
> Aditya Mahajan via ntg-context wrote:
>
> > Did you source the `setuptex` script, which sets the correct path.
>
> My PATH is set to
> PATH=./c
On 4/11/2023 1:58 AM, Carlos via ntg-context wrote:
I'm just following some of the standalone installation instructions
as per the wiki alongside a TeX Live installation, but there are a
few things that don't add up or I can't seem to add them up :).
first, while I was trying to mtxrun
ntext/standalone/context --version
ls -la /full/path/to/texlive/2023/context
ls -la /full/path/to/context/standalone/context
(I'll also add that I have both the ConTeXt and TeX Live versions of
"context" installed on Li
On Mon, 10 Apr 2023 20:51:58 -0400 (EDT)
Aditya Mahajan via ntg-context wrote:
> Did you source the `setuptex` script, which sets the correct path.
My PATH is set to
PATH=./context/tex/texmf-freebsd-amd64/bin:/home/MyAccount/context/tex/texmf-freebsd-amd64/bin:...
If my current work
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 08:51:58PM -0400, Aditya Mahajan via ntg-context wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Apr 2023, Carlos via ntg-context wrote:
>
> > I'm just following some of the standalone installation instructions
> > as per the wiki alongside a TeX Live installation, but there ar
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 08:51:58PM -0400, Aditya Mahajan via ntg-context wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Apr 2023, Carlos via ntg-context wrote:
>
> > I'm just following some of the standalone installation instructions
> > as per the wiki alongside a TeX Live installation, but there ar
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 08:51:58PM -0400, Aditya Mahajan via ntg-context wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Apr 2023, Carlos via ntg-context wrote:
>
> > I'm just following some of the standalone installation instructions
> > as per the wiki alongside a TeX Live installation, but there ar
On Mon, 10 Apr 2023, Carlos via ntg-context wrote:
> I'm just following some of the standalone installation instructions
> as per the wiki alongside a TeX Live installation, but there are a
> few things that don't add up or I can't seem to add them up :).
>
> first, whi
I'm just following some of the standalone installation instructions
as per the wiki alongside a TeX Live installation, but there are a
few things that don't add up or I can't seem to add them up :).
first, while I was trying to mtxrun --generate it returned
/usr/bin/env texlua no such file
h is a valid question but nevertheless unsettling in that
> > lmodern-regular may nat have been called out. I fully understand the
> > inclusion of a latinmodern-math in it as a lucidamath was not previously
> > available but I ponder at the idea and involuntary implementation of
damath was not previously available but I
ponder at the idea and involuntary implementation of having lmroman along the
pack. Why? If this is TeX doings, or misdoings (depending how one looks at it),
it clearly shows to me that TeX also restricts my freedom to use whatever font
I may deem nec
usion of a
latinmodern-math in it as a lucidamath was not previously available but I
ponder at the idea and involuntary implementation of having lmroman along the
pack. Why? If this is TeX doings, or misdoings (depending how one looks at it),
it clearly shows to me that TeX also restricts my fre
On 3/31/2023 10:08 PM, Carlos via ntg-context wrote:
sure, why should it, you want lucida so better quit with an error than
kicking in some font; actually cmr math fonts have been obsoleted for way
over a decade by latin modern math fonts in 32 bit font engines
Font loading and processing
as_place_number
> > \strc_formulas_flush_number \dostarttagged \t!formulacontent \empty
> > \dotagregisterformula \c_strc_formulas_n \csname \e!stop \formulaparameter
> > \c!alternative \v!formula \endcsname
>
> dunno, that's numbering, not math
>
> > Okay. So I tr
family. For example, plain TeX doesn't allow \it or \sl in
subscripts. Proceed, and I'll try to forget that I needed that character.»
There's not even a fallback to cmr or any other font.
sure, why should it, you want lucida so better quit with an error than
kicking in some font; actually cmr mat
have been set. This
is
normally done by loading special math fonts into the math family slots. Your
font
set is lacking at least the parameter mentioned earlier.»
Sorry, but sorry doesn't cut it here.
I guess it must have been referring to \strc_formulas_place_number
\strc_formulas_flush_number
On 3/28/2023 7:05 PM, Carlos via ntg-context wrote:
On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 03:43:47PM +0200, Hans Hagen via ntg-context wrote:
On 3/27/2023 3:31 PM, Carlos via ntg-context wrote:
mkiv lua stats > loaded fonts: 4 files: latinmodern-math.otf,
lmroman10-regular.otf, lucidabrightregular.ttf,
On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 03:43:47PM +0200, Hans Hagen via ntg-context wrote:
> On 3/27/2023 3:31 PM, Carlos via ntg-context wrote:
>
> > mkiv lua stats > loaded fonts: 4 files: latinmodern-math.otf,
> > lmroman10-regular.otf, lucidabrightregular.ttf, lucidasansregular.ttf
>
> i admit never
On 3/27/2023 3:31 PM, Carlos via ntg-context wrote:
mkiv lua stats > loaded fonts: 4 files: latinmodern-math.otf,
lmroman10-regular.otf, lucidabrightregular.ttf, lucidasansregular.ttf
i admit never having seen lucida ttf files (but when opentype ttf files
are used with an afm file present
On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 09:26:36PM +0100, Hans Hagen via ntg-context wrote:
> On 3/25/2023 8:55 PM, Carlos via ntg-context wrote:
> > Hello list:
> >
> > This is under a fresh TeXLive installation. Sort as to put aside any
> > texlive prepackaged issues.
> >
> > And the followign lines is the
s | variable 'OSFONTDIR' specifies path
> > > > '/usr/share/fonts'
> > > > fonts | names | globbing path '/home/ce/**.otf'
>
> There is something strange here.
> Is maybe TEXMFHOME set?
>
> Since you use a TeX live installation, some other texmf
man12-regular.otf
mkiv lua stats > font engine: otf 3.113, afm 1.513, tfm 1.000, 12 instances, 6
shared in backend, 4 common vectors, 2 common hashes, load time 0.413 seconds
mkiv lua stats > used platform: linux-64, type: unix, binary subtree: usr
mkiv lua stats > used engine: luatex vers
s | variable 'OSFONTDIR' specifies path
> > > > > > '/usr/share/fonts'
> > > > > > fonts | names | globbing path '/home/ce/**.otf'
> > >
> > > There is something strange here.
> > > Is maybe TEXMFHOME set?
> > >
| globbing path '/home/ce/**.otf'
There is something strange here.
Is maybe TEXMFHOME set?
Since you use a TeX live installation, some other texmfcnf.lua or texmf.cnf
might interfere.
Look into /usr/local/texlive/2023/
I'll check again to make sure. But keep in mind this issue predates
s | variable 'OSFONTDIR' specifies path
> > > > '/usr/share/fonts'
> > > > fonts | names | globbing path '/home/ce/**.otf'
>
> There is something strange here.
> Is maybe TEXMFHOME set?
>
> Since you use a TeX live installation, some other texmfcnf.l
| names | variable 'OSFONTDIR' specifies path '/home/ce'
fonts | names | variable 'OSFONTDIR' specifies path '/usr/share/fonts'
fonts | names | globbing path '/home/ce/**.otf'
There is something strange here.
Is maybe TEXMFHOME set?
Since you use a TeX live installation, some
ntg-context wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > ...xlive/2023/texmf-dist/tex/context/base/mkiv/font-syn.lua:1030: in
> > > > upvalue 'walk_tree'
> > > Maybe your OSFONTDIR is pointing to empty. Does
> >
> > Good call. Thank you for the reminder H
On 3/25/2023 10:36 PM, Carlos via ntg-context wrote:
On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 09:45:25PM +0100, Hans Hagen via ntg-context wrote:
On 3/25/2023 8:55 PM, Carlos via ntg-context wrote:
...xlive/2023/texmf-dist/tex/context/base/mkiv/font-syn.lua:1030: in
upvalue 'walk_tree'
Maybe your
On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 09:45:25PM +0100, Hans Hagen via ntg-context wrote:
> On 3/25/2023 8:55 PM, Carlos via ntg-context wrote:
>
> > ...xlive/2023/texmf-dist/tex/context/base/mkiv/font-syn.lua:1030:
> > in upvalue 'walk_tree'
> Maybe your OSFONTDIR is pointing
3/texmf-config,
home:texmf, !!selfautoparent:texmf-config, !!selfautoparent:texmf-var,
!!selfautoparent:texmf-project, !!selfautoparent:texmf-fonts,
!!selfautoparent:texmf-local, !!selfautoparent:texmf-dist}/tex/context//
resolvers | lists | res: .\{/home/ce/.texlive2023/texmf-config,
/home/c
On 3/25/2023 8:55 PM, Carlos via ntg-context wrote:
...xlive/2023/texmf-dist/tex/context/base/mkiv/font-syn.lua:1030: in
upvalue 'walk_tree'
Maybe your OSFONTDIR is pointing to empty. Does
mtxrun --script font --reload
work
Hans
On 3/25/2023 8:55 PM, Carlos via ntg-context wrote:
Hello list:
This is under a fresh TeXLive installation. Sort as to put aside any texlive
prepackaged issues.
And the followign lines is the output of the error I've been having with the
call of context on a recent texlive installation by
after.
mtxrun --script cache --erase has also been called out to no avail
registered function call [1160]:
...live/2023/texmf-dist/tex/context/base/mkiv/l-sandbox.lua:87: cannot open /.:
Permission denied
stack traceback:
[C]: in upvalue 'func'
...live/2023/texmf-dist/tex/context
On 2/5/23 13:44, Hans Hagen via ntg-context wrote:
> On 2/4/2023 10:10 AM, Pablo Rodriguez via ntg-context wrote:
>>> https://wiki.contextgarden.net/French_spacing Not helpful alas.
>>
>> Would you be so kind to update the wiki?
>>
>> I hope it helps,
> Assuming that you document it I'll add
>
>
your point, since this is also a question of
perspective.
What may be named “French spacing” in English may be considered as
“English spacing” in any other European language.
But this is pure TeX
(https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/teximpatient.git/plain/teximpatient/book.pdf#search=null
rspective.
What may be named “French spacing” in English may be considered as
“English spacing” in any other European language.
But this is pure TeX
(https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/teximpatient.git/plain/teximpatient/book.pdf#search=null):
\starttext
\startTEXpage[offset=1em]
PhD. Next senten
List: What method should one use to code whitespace after a period as
being sentence-ending, not midsentence, when not employing French
spacing? For example, if one writes
"... John Doe, PhD. Next sentence x y z ... ."
the space in "PhD. Next".
In LaTeX, we have "\@. " (code whitespace
The attached MWE shows how to:
- embed tex code in or <script
</tt><tt>type="text/vnd.lmtx"> HTML elements to be run by ConTeXt
</tt><pre style="margin: 0em;">
- embed lua code in <script type="text/x-lua"> elements to be
Thanks Hans, and Rik. Perhaps I need to take a much closer look at this
file to see if I have created some grouping issues. The removal of the
.tuc file is a very handy tip that I hadn't thought of, and I assume it
is associated with the way Hans put it, namely, 'looks like you load the
same
On 2022-03-17 18:14, jbf via ntg-context wrote:
I'd like to understand what is happening in this particular instance:
While playing with a suggestion to a recent request (re
\currentlistentrynumber etc.) I suddenly got a compiling error:
TeX capacity exceeded, sorry [file=2000].
I returned
On 3/17/2022 11:14 PM, jbf via ntg-context wrote:
I'd like to understand what is happening in this particular instance:
While playing with a suggestion to a recent request (re
\currentlistentrynumber etc.) I suddenly got a compiling error:
TeX capacity exceeded, sorry [file=2000].
I
I'd like to understand what is happening in this particular instance:
While playing with a suggestion to a recent request (re
\currentlistentrynumber etc.) I suddenly got a compiling error:
TeX capacity exceeded, sorry [file=2000].
I returned everything to how it was before I was trying out
list for ConTeXt users
To: Richard Mahoney via ntg-context
Cc: Hans Hagen
Subject: Re: [NTG-context] LMTX-latest | SciTE 5.1.6 --- 5.2.1 | Not
working with tex/texmf-context/context/data/scite
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2022 08:53:06 +0100
Mailer: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0)
Gecko
On 3/3/2022 12:08 AM, Richard Mahoney via ntg-context wrote:
[Gentoo]
I've found that the config included with LMTX in:
tex/texmf-context/context/data/scite
does not work with SciTE 5.1.6+
The latest version that seems to be working is SciTE 5.1.5.
Version 5.1.5 Scintilla: 5.1.4 Lexilla
[Gentoo]
I've found that the config included with LMTX in:
tex/texmf-context/context/data/scite
does not work with SciTE 5.1.6+
The latest version that seems to be working is SciTE 5.1.5.
Version 5.1.5 Scintilla: 5.1.4 Lexilla: 5.1.3
compiled for GTK:3.24.29
Nov 14 2021 12:15:50
Is anyone
On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 11:33 AM Henning Hraban Ramm via ntg-context <
ntg-context@ntg.nl> wrote:
> WTF, someone wrote a LaTeX format for LuaMetaTeX already 3 years ago:
> https://github.com/zauguin/luametalatex
>
>
>
sure -- he is not "someone", we know Marcel .
--
luigi
WTF, someone wrote a LaTeX format for LuaMetaTeX already 3 years ago:
https://github.com/zauguin/luametalatex
(Herbert Voss just pointed me to it.)
Hraban
___
If your question is of interest to others as well,
On 1/29/2022 3:47 PM, Joel via ntg-context wrote:
I have several books in a set that have many things I'd like to have
linked together, such as page references, shared indexes, shared
glossaries, etc.
One solution I see is putting all the files together, then using a tool
like pdfjam to
I have several books in a set that have many things I'd like to have linked
together, such as page references, shared indexes, shared glossaries, etc.
One solution I see is putting all the files together, then using a tool like
pdfjam to seperate the pages later, but I'm wondering if ConTeXt
On 10/3/2021 1:41 AM, Bruce Horrocks via ntg-context wrote:
In the test suite, the file fonts/features-005.tex is failing for me on latest
lmtx. All three items appear the same each time i.e. no small caps and no
old-style digits on the second and third.
<http://www.pragma-ade.com/cont
In the test suite, the file fonts/features-005.tex is failing for me on latest
lmtx. All three items appear the same each time i.e. no small caps and no
old-style digits on the second and third.
<http://www.pragma-ade.com/context/latest/cont-tst.zip>
Can anyone else reproduce this,
On 9/5/2021 10:14 AM, Hans van der Meer via ntg-context wrote:
There is something I do not understand in the passing of parameters from
TeX to LuaTex.
This is my TeX definition:
\def\ListSort[#1]#2{\directlua{hvdm.listsort([===[#2]===],[===[#1]===])}}
tex haalt de {} rond #2 weg
Calling
And \ListSort[[abc]]{value} turns out to be worse: doesn't makes it into LuaTeX
at all.
dr. Hans van der Meer
> On 5 Sep 2021, at 10:14, Hans van der Meer via ntg-context
> wrote:
>
> There is something I do not understand in the passing of parameters from TeX
> to LuaTex.
&
There is something I do not understand in the passing of parameters from TeX to
LuaTex.
This is my TeX definition:
\def\ListSort[#1]#2{\directlua{hvdm.listsort([===[#2]===],[===[#1]===])}}
Calling \ListSort[sep={ + }]{} delivers the string 'sep={ + }' into LuaTeX as
the printout in the logfile
On 8/10/2021 9:23 AM, Taco Hoekwater via ntg-context wrote:
On 9 Aug 2021, at 22:05, Aditya Mahajan via ntg-context
wrote:
On Mon, 9 Aug 2021, Hans van der Meer via ntg-context wrote:
In the TeX to Lua interface with
\def\Macro#1{\directlua{luafunction("#1")}}
the transfe
1 - 100 of 1397 matches
Mail list logo
